One of the effects of the downturn in the economy is the decrease in divorces. From 2007-2008 there were 300 fewer divorces in Cuyahoga County (Cleveland). It’s also been hypothesized that this occurs because the financial challenges presented to families force them to converse more and possibly helps them to restore communication and trust. Should we look to see the divorce rate rise as the economy rebounds? If so, does this mean that we should pray for a greater economic recession and failure so that families might be saved? Oh well, never mind. I suspect that Congress will remove this option from us. I’ve just heard that they are proposing a bill that would bail out the divorce lawyers who are suffering the loss of business, so that couples who want a divorce but who cannot economically afford one can get the needed divorce. After all, we all know that there is a right to divorce. Pardon my sarcasm.
I want to commend my Democratic congressman, John Boccieri. He voted his conscience, not the party line in voting against the “Pelosi” Health Care Bill. Afterwards, his public comment was that it was too expensive to support. I agree, though there are many more problems than that, including the fact that philosophically it moves the United States closer and closer to a socialist and authoritarian governmental structure. The question this expense rationale presents, however, for Congressman Boccieri is this: How can the Health Care Bill be considered too costly or too expensive when you voted for the Cap and Trade Bill? Why wasn’t the Cap and Trade Bill also considered too expensive for you?
I blame the educational system of America for the current crisis in the health care debate. The American people cannot recognize socialism when they see it. Prior to the 2008 election I wrote that Obama is a socialist, but with his support for the banking bailout McCain proved himself to lean in that direction as well. More and more I hear people regurgitating the theme that capitalism is the cause of the economic problems. If people knew history, they would know that this is an echo of Karl Marx. Educated people know that socialism is absolutely devastating to a culture.
The other night I was lecturing to a class about postmodernism and the class was reading Os Guinness’ book Time for Truth. The book has on its cover the unforgettable picture of the young man boldly confronting the row of military tanks in Tiananmen Square. As I was pointing out the picture one of the young men in my college class said to me, “I was born on that day.” And it immediately struck me how important it is to teach our young people an accurate understanding of history. They don’t know what happened in Tiananmen Square, they don’t know Viet Nam, and many of us have forgotten how tens of millions were murdered, executed and destroyed by the Socialist regimes of Mao, the Soviets especially under Stalin, and the Nazis. Socialism inevitably leads to conformity, intolerance, and totalitarianism. History unquestioningly confirms this.
Speaking of freedom, this week we celebrated the twentieth anniversary of the dismantling of the Berlin Wall separating Germans, Berliners, and families from one another. It’s still hard to fathom and I’ve walked through Checkpoint Charlie. Ask the young people you know whether they know why the Wall was constructed and see what they say. In most cases they do not. They have not been taught that it was built not to keep people out, but to keep people in, to keep people from freedom, to keep them from escaping to freedom. This is socialism. This will be the consequence of the health care bill and is the same philosophy which says that those who do not have health insurance will be arrested and either jailed or fined as the already passed congressional health bill proposes